British Prime Minister Theresa May's government remained defiant today after Parliament took partial control of the stalled process of leaving the European Union, arguing Tuesday that the manoeuvring simply underscores the need for lawmakers to approve her twice-defeated deal.
The House of Commons voted late Monday to wrest the parliamentary timetable away from the government temporarily so that lawmakers can vote on alternatives to the withdrawal agreement May negotiated with the EU.
The government, which usually controls the scheduling of votes in Parliament, said the lawmakers' move "upends the balance between our democratic institutions and sets a dangerous, unpredictable precedent for the future."
Votes are due to be held Wednesday on options that could include remaining in the EU's single market and customs union, calling a new membership referendum and cancelling Brexit outright.
May's authority is hanging by a thread after 30 members of her Conservative Party defied her instructions and voted for Parliament to take control of the process. Three government ministers resigned rather than vote with the government.
Richard Harrington, who resigned as a business minister to vote in favour of Monday's motion, accused the government of "playing roulette" with people and businesses lives by failing to resolve Britain's Brexit impasse.
Almost three years after Britons voted to leave the EU, the date and terms of its departure are up in the air. Last week the EU granted Britain a delay to the scheduled March 29 exit date, saying that if Parliament approved the proposed divorce deal, the UK would leave the EU on May 22. If not, the government has until April 12 to tell the 27 remaining EU countries what it plans to do — leave without a deal, cancel Brexit or chart a path to a new option.
Lawmakers who backed Monday's motion, which passed 329-302, hope to find an alternative that can command a majority in Parliament by holding a series of "indicative votes" on other options.
May is continuing to push for approval of her deal with the EU even though the House of Commons overwhelmingly rejected it during votes in January and March.
"I have always thought that 'no deal' is better than Mrs. May's deal, but Mrs. May's deal is better than not leaving at all," he said on the Conservative Home podcast.
Cabinet ministers met for more than two hours on Tuesday to discuss Brexit and the looming votes in Parliament. Some ministers are pushing for lawmakers to be allowed to follow their consciences, rather than follow a party line on alternatives to the prime minister's deal.
"Parliament should seek urgently to resolve the situation by considering alternatives freely, without the instruction of party whips, and government should adopt any feasible outcome as its own in order to progress matters," said Alistair Burt, who quit his role in the Foreign Office after defying May on Monday.
"I did not believe the government was prepared to do that, so had to vote to ensure this happens."
Some members of the public, meanwhile, are losing patience with the parliamentary process. Russell Robinson, an executive in the tech field, said he was fed up.
"It's a little bit similar to the way that when you're in quite a good nightclub and then a friend of yours says ... 'I know somewhere else to go' and then you all leave and then you realize you can't get into the other club.