Buenos Aires Times

Climate change is as serious as poverty and corruption in Argentina

In Argentina, the Macri administration has been good at marketing its intentions to tackle climate change, but this is still not enough.

Wednesday 4 October, 2017
As an example: over the last ten years, seas' level raised more than eight centimeters per year, according to NASA.
As an example: over the last ten years, seas' level raised more than eight centimeters per year, according to NASA. Foto:Cedoc.

More Opinion and analysis News

A report released this week concluded that extreme weather, exacerbated by climate change, caused economic losses in the United States of approximately US$240 billion per year in the past decade. In 2017 alone, Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria, along with 76 wildfires across nine  Western US states (including Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands) caused nearly US$300 billion in losses and damage, according to the  Universal Ecological Fund. They expect the cost to rise to US$360 billion per year in the next decade.

Climate change isn’t a major source of anxiety for most Argentines. A recent UADE-Voices! survey showed only nine percent considered it the  most important global issue, behind drug-trafficking (18 percent), wars (14 percent), and humantrafficking (10 percent), and just ahead of global  hunger (seven percent). Yet, intense flooding in Cordoba, Santa Fe, La Pampa, and Buenos Aires, along with draughts and wildfires, have caused  extensive damage and loss in the “breadbasket of the world,” figures which end up being forgotten in the face of rising yields for soybeans and  the Mauricio Macri administration’s favourable taxation treatment of the agricultural sector.

Whatever you may think about manmade climate change, it has become crystal clear to scientists that global warming is happening, leading to  hotter days becoming hotter and more frequent, along with droughts and heavy storms occurring with greater intensity. At Columbia University’s  Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory — where they first proved plate tectonics and successfully predicted El Niño’s devastating weather patterns  — the focus has been put on lowering CO2 levels, addressing rising sea levels, and predicting extreme weather. They are developing a method to  convert CO2 into rock and trying to predict how melting at the poles will affect coastal regions, where 2.75 billion people will live — and be at  risk — by 2025.

At the political level, it is disappointing to see US President Donald Trump call climate change a “hoax” and claim that he will pull his country out  of the Paris Agreement, despite it being a voluntarily imposed target of CO2 reductions. Looking to generate “energy independence,” Trump has  rolled back a variety of the Barack Obama administration’s climate projects including the Clean Power Plan and the Climate Action Plan, leading the Climate Action Tracker (CAT) to label US policies “critically insufficient” to achieve the goals set out in the Paris Agreement. The US is the  world’s second largest emitter of CO2, well ahead of Russia and India, and behind China.

In Argentina, the Macri administration has been good at marketing its intentions to tackle climate change, but this is still not enough. This year has  een declared the “year of renewable energy” and the government has committed to meeting eight percent of Argentina’s electricity demand  with renewables by 2018 and 20 percent by 2025. We currently stand below two percent. The government has already awarded more than 2,400  megawatts in competitive renewable energy auctions in the context of their RenoVar project, with the support of the World Bank.

Even having passed a BioFuels law and a Renewable Energy law, CAT considers Argentina’s voluntary Paris Agreement targets absolutely out of  reach under current policies, with CO2 emissions projected to increase 50 percent above 2010 levels by 2030.

Cognitively, we have an automatic decision-making process that makes analytical and deliberative thinking draining, as famed neuroscientist  Facundo Manes explains. Our decision-making process is also moulded by emotions and the social context in which we interact. Thus, Manes  argues, the decision-making context of people in conditions of poverty exacerbates that same poverty. 

“Economic growth doesn’t reduce poverty,” Manes explains, “instead we must focus on what’s most important, our brains.” 

Climate cognition has been studied by sociologists, linguists and communicators, and it refers to the analysis of how one’s personal world view  can lead to denying the impact of the climate, or a person’s impact in solving issues like climate change.

In the same way as we feel outraged by violence, poverty, and corruption, Argentines should acknowledge the perils of climate change and begin  to take action to reduce our CO2 emissions. Change is difficult, as Manes explains, but we have no alternative. As Pope Francis put it, “everyone, great or small, has a moral responsibility […] we must take it seriously […] history will judge our decision.” Speaking of climate change deniers,  he added it reminded him of “a phrase from the Old Testament: man is a fool, a stubborn man who will not see.”

Poll

Op-Ed

Top Stories

  1. 1The world swings to the rightThe world swings to the right
  2. 2Vélez Sarsfield lose court case over player’s move to Manchester City
  3. 3IMF predicts brighter Brazil economy in 2018-2019
  4. 4Elite universities: How 'admissible' are you?
  5. 5In symbolic vote, Venezuelan legislators vote to prosecute Maduro
  6. 6Macri to celebrate return of lemon exports to US market following 17-year absence
  7. 7Reshuffling: Peronist senator returns to CFK, as ex allies form leftist coalition
  8. 8Activists renew calls for legal abortions
  9. 9A history of political violence and the issue of the Mapuches
  10. 10Miguel Díaz-Canel: Meet the president for Cuba's post-Castro era